Third Party Risk Management Lifecycle Explained

In today’s interconnected business environment, organizations increasingly rely on third-party vendors and service providers to enhance their operational capabilities. However, this reliance introduces a spectrum of risks that can significantly impact an organization’s performance and reputation. Understanding the third party risk management lifecycle is crucial as it serves as a critical framework for identifying, assessing, and mitigating risks associated with external partnerships.

Definition of Third Party Risk Management

Third-party risk management refers to the processes and practices that organizations implement to manage the risks posed by external entities that provide goods or services. These risks can encompass a variety of factors, including operational, financial, compliance, and reputational risks. TPRM aims to ensure that organizations maintain control over their risk exposure while leveraging the benefits of third-party relationships. This involves a systematic approach to evaluating the potential risks associated with third parties throughout the entire lifecycle of the relationship, from selection to termination[1][2].

Importance of Managing Risks Associated with Third Parties

The significance of managing third-party risks cannot be overstated. As organizations expand their reliance on external vendors, they expose themselves to various vulnerabilities that can lead to significant consequences. For instance, a data breach at a third-party vendor can compromise sensitive information, resulting in financial losses and reputational damage. Moreover, regulatory compliance is a growing concern, as organizations are held accountable for the actions of their third-party partners. Effective TPRM helps organizations:

Protect Sensitive Data: By assessing the security measures of third parties, organizations can safeguard their data and maintain customer trust.

Ensure Compliance: With increasing regulatory scrutiny, managing third-party risks is essential for compliance with laws and regulations, thereby avoiding penalties.

Enhance Operational Resilience: A robust TPRM framework enables organizations to identify potential disruptions in their supply chain and develop contingency plans.

Mitigate Financial Losses: By proactively managing risks, organizations can reduce the likelihood of financial losses stemming from third-party failures or breaches[3][4].

Overview of the Third Party Risk Management Lifecycle

The third-party risk management lifecycle consists of several key stages that guide organizations in effectively managing their relationships with external vendors. Understanding this lifecycle is crucial for internal audit professionals, as it provides a structured approach to risk assessment and mitigation. The lifecycle typically includes the following phases:

Planning and Strategy: This initial phase involves defining the organization’s risk appetite and establishing a TPRM framework that aligns with business objectives.

Due Diligence: Before engaging with a third party, organizations conduct thorough due diligence to assess the vendor’s financial stability, compliance history, and operational capabilities. This step is critical for identifying potential risks early in the relationship.

Onboarding: Once a vendor is selected, the onboarding process includes formalizing contracts and service level agreements (SLAs) that outline expectations and responsibilities.

Monitoring and Review: Continuous monitoring of third-party performance and risk exposure is essential. This phase involves regular assessments, audits, and reviews to ensure compliance with established standards and to identify any emerging risks.

Termination: When a third-party relationship is no longer beneficial or poses unacceptable risks, organizations must have a clear termination process in place. This includes ensuring that all data and assets are returned or securely disposed of.

By understanding and implementing the third-party risk management lifecycle, internal audit professionals can play a pivotal role in mitigating risks associated with external partnerships, ultimately contributing to the organization’s overall risk management strategy[5][6].

The effective management of third-party risks is essential for safeguarding an organization’s assets and reputation. Internal audit professionals are uniquely positioned to oversee this process, ensuring that risks are identified, assessed, and mitigated throughout the lifecycle of third-party relationships. As organizations continue to navigate the complexities of external partnerships, the role of internal audit in TPRM will only become more critical.

Understanding the Third Party Risk Management Lifecycle

In the realm of internal audit, the management of third-party risks is a critical function that ensures organizations maintain compliance, protect their assets, and uphold their reputations. The third-party risk management (TPRM) lifecycle encompasses several stages, each playing a vital role in identifying, assessing, and mitigating risks associated with external vendors and partners. This section outlines the key stages of the TPRM lifecycle and their relevance to internal audit professionals.

1. Identification of Third Parties

The first step in the TPRM lifecycle is the identification of third parties that an organization engages with. This includes vendors, suppliers, contractors, and any external entities that provide goods or services. Internal auditors must ensure that a comprehensive inventory of third parties is maintained, as this forms the foundation for effective risk management. By cataloging these relationships, auditors can better understand the potential risks associated with each third party, including operational, financial, compliance, and reputational risks[1][2].

2. Risk Assessment and Due Diligence

Once third parties are identified, the next stage involves conducting thorough risk assessments and due diligence. This process evaluates the potential risks posed by each third party, considering factors such as their financial stability, regulatory compliance, and operational capabilities. Internal auditors play a crucial role in this stage by developing risk assessment frameworks that align with the organization’s risk appetite and regulatory requirements. Effective due diligence not only helps in identifying red flags but also informs decision-making regarding which third parties to engage with[3][4].

3. Contract Negotiation and Management

Following the risk assessment, the next phase is contract negotiation and management. Internal auditors should be involved in reviewing contracts to ensure that they include appropriate risk mitigation clauses, such as compliance requirements, performance metrics, and termination rights. This stage is critical as it establishes the terms of engagement and sets expectations for both parties. Auditors must ensure that contracts are not only legally sound but also aligned with the organization’s risk management strategies, thereby minimizing potential liabilities[5][6].

4. Ongoing Monitoring and Performance Evaluation

The TPRM lifecycle does not end with contract execution; ongoing monitoring and performance evaluation are essential to ensure that third parties continue to meet their obligations and that risks remain manageable. Internal auditors should implement continuous monitoring processes that assess third-party performance against established metrics and compliance standards. This may involve regular audits, performance reviews, and risk reassessments to identify any emerging risks or changes in the third-party’s operational landscape. By maintaining vigilance, internal auditors can help organizations respond proactively to potential issues before they escalate[7].

5. Termination and Transition Processes

The final stage of the TPRM lifecycle involves the termination and transition processes when a third-party relationship comes to an end. Internal auditors must ensure that there are clear procedures in place for the termination of contracts, including the return of sensitive data, the settlement of outstanding obligations, and the management of any residual risks. Additionally, effective transition planning is crucial when moving to a new vendor or supplier, as it helps mitigate disruptions and ensures continuity of operations. Internal auditors should review these processes to ensure they are robust and compliant with organizational policies and regulatory requirements[9].

The third-party risk management lifecycle is a comprehensive framework that internal audit professionals must navigate to effectively mitigate risks associated with external relationships. By understanding and actively participating in each stage—from identification and risk assessment to ongoing monitoring and termination—internal auditors can significantly enhance their organization’s risk management capabilities. Implementing best practices in TPRM not only safeguards the organization but also fosters a culture of accountability and transparency in managing third-party relationships. As the landscape of third-party engagements continues to evolve, the role of internal audit in this lifecycle will remain critical in ensuring organizational resilience and compliance.

Key Risks Associated with Third Parties

In today’s interconnected business environment, organizations increasingly rely on third parties for various services, from IT support to supply chain management. While these partnerships can enhance operational efficiency and drive innovation, they also introduce a spectrum of risks that internal audit professionals must vigilantly monitor. Understanding these risks is crucial for effective third-party risk management (TPRM) and for safeguarding the organization’s interests. Below, we delve into the key risks associated with third parties, emphasizing the critical role of internal audit in mitigating these challenges.

Operational Risks

Operational risks arise from the potential failure of third-party services to meet contractual obligations or performance standards. This can include delays in service delivery, inadequate quality of products, or failure to adhere to agreed-upon processes. Such disruptions can lead to significant operational inefficiencies and impact the organization’s ability to serve its customers effectively. Internal audit plays a vital role in assessing the operational capabilities of third parties, ensuring that they have robust processes in place to mitigate these risks. Regular audits can help identify weaknesses in third-party operations and recommend improvements to enhance reliability and performance[1][2].

Compliance Risks

Compliance risks are associated with the potential for third parties to violate laws, regulations, or internal policies, which can expose the organization to legal penalties and reputational damage. This is particularly pertinent in industries with stringent regulatory requirements, such as finance and healthcare. Internal audit functions must evaluate the compliance frameworks of third parties, ensuring they align with applicable regulations and standards. By conducting thorough due diligence and ongoing monitoring, internal auditors can help organizations avoid costly compliance breaches and maintain regulatory integrity[3][4].

Financial Risks

Financial risks related to third parties can manifest in various forms, including the potential for financial instability or insolvency of a vendor, which could disrupt service delivery and lead to unexpected costs. Additionally, third parties may not have adequate financial controls, increasing the risk of fraud or mismanagement. Internal audit is essential in assessing the financial health of third-party vendors through financial audits and risk assessments. By identifying financially vulnerable partners, organizations can take proactive measures to mitigate these risks, such as diversifying their vendor base or establishing contingency plans[6].

Reputational Risks

The actions of third parties can significantly impact an organization’s reputation. Negative publicity stemming from a third party’s unethical behavior, poor service, or compliance failures can tarnish the organization’s image and erode customer trust. Internal audit can help mitigate reputational risks by ensuring that third parties adhere to ethical standards and corporate social responsibility practices. Regular assessments of third-party conduct and performance can help organizations identify potential reputational threats early and implement corrective actions before issues escalate[7][8].

Cybersecurity Risks

In an era where data breaches and cyber threats are prevalent, third-party relationships can introduce significant cybersecurity risks. Third parties may have access to sensitive data or critical systems, and any vulnerabilities in their security practices can expose the organization to cyberattacks. Internal audit must evaluate the cybersecurity measures of third parties, ensuring they have robust protocols in place to protect data and systems. This includes assessing their incident response plans, data encryption practices, and overall cybersecurity posture. By conducting thorough cybersecurity audits, internal auditors can help organizations safeguard their information assets and mitigate the risk of cyber incidents stemming from third-party relationships[9][10].

The landscape of third-party risk management is complex and fraught with challenges that can have far-reaching implications for organizations. Internal audit professionals play a pivotal role in identifying, assessing, and mitigating these risks through comprehensive audits and ongoing monitoring. By understanding the operational, compliance, financial, reputational, and cybersecurity risks associated with third parties, internal auditors can help organizations navigate these challenges effectively, ensuring that third-party relationships contribute positively to overall business objectives while safeguarding against potential threats.

Incorporating best practices in TPRM not only enhances risk management but also strengthens the organization’s resilience in an increasingly interconnected world.

The Role of Internal Audit in Third Party Risk Management

In today’s interconnected business environment, organizations increasingly rely on third-party vendors and service providers to enhance their operations. However, this reliance introduces various risks that can significantly impact an organization’s performance and reputation. Internal audit plays a pivotal role in third-party risk management (TPRM) by ensuring that these risks are effectively identified, assessed, and mitigated throughout the TPRM lifecycle. This section explores how internal audit contributes to each stage of the TPRM lifecycle, emphasizing best practices that internal audit professionals can adopt.

Conducting Risk Assessments

The first step in the Third Party Risk Management lifecycle is conducting comprehensive risk assessments. Internal audit teams are uniquely positioned to evaluate the potential risks associated with third-party relationships. They can leverage their expertise to identify various risk factors, including operational, financial, compliance, and reputational risks. By employing a systematic approach, internal auditors can categorize third parties based on their risk profiles, which helps prioritize resources and focus on high-risk vendors[1][2].

Best practices for internal auditors in this phase include:

Utilizing risk assessment frameworks to ensure consistency and thoroughness.

Engaging with stakeholders to gather insights on potential risks.

Regularly updating risk assessments to reflect changes in the business environment or vendor performance.

Evaluating Due Diligence Processes

Once risks are identified, the next critical step is evaluating the due diligence processes employed by the organization. Internal audit can assess whether the organization conducts adequate background checks and evaluations of third-party vendors before engagement. This includes reviewing the vendor’s financial stability, compliance history, and operational capabilities[3][4].

To enhance due diligence practices, internal auditors should:

Develop a checklist of essential due diligence criteria tailored to the organization’s specific needs.

Ensure that due diligence processes are documented and consistently applied across all vendor assessments.

Collaborate with procurement and legal teams to align due diligence efforts with contractual obligations and regulatory requirements.

Reviewing Contract Terms and Compliance

Internal audit also plays a crucial role in reviewing contract terms and ensuring compliance with regulatory and organizational standards. This involves examining contracts for clarity, completeness, and alignment with the organization’s risk appetite. Internal auditors should verify that contracts include appropriate clauses related to data protection, service level agreements (SLAs), and termination rights[5][6].

Best practices in this area include:

Conducting regular audits of contract management processes to identify gaps or inconsistencies.

Ensuring that contracts are reviewed by legal experts to mitigate potential liabilities.

Monitoring compliance with contract terms throughout the vendor relationship.

Monitoring Third Party Performance and Risk Exposure

Ongoing monitoring of third-party performance and risk exposure is essential for effective TPRM. Internal audit can establish key performance indicators (KPIs) and risk metrics to evaluate vendor performance continuously. This proactive approach allows organizations to identify potential issues before they escalate into significant problems[7][8].

To optimize monitoring efforts, internal auditors should:

Implement a robust reporting system that tracks vendor performance against established KPIs.

Conduct periodic reviews of third-party risk exposure, adjusting risk assessments as necessary.

Foster open communication with vendors to address performance issues promptly.

Reporting Findings and Recommendations to Stakeholders

Finally, internal audit is responsible for reporting findings and recommendations to stakeholders, including senior management and the board of directors. Effective communication of audit results is vital for ensuring that stakeholders understand the risks associated with third-party relationships and the actions required to mitigate them[10].

Best practices for reporting include:

Presenting findings in a clear, concise manner, highlighting key risks and recommended actions.

Utilizing data visualization tools to enhance the understanding of complex information.

Following up on previous audit recommendations to ensure accountability and continuous improvement.

The role of internal audit in Third Party Risk Management lifecycle is critical for safeguarding an organization’s interests in an increasingly complex vendor landscape. By conducting thorough risk assessments, evaluating due diligence processes, reviewing contracts, monitoring performance, and effectively reporting findings, internal auditors can significantly mitigate third-party risks. Adopting these best practices not only enhances the effectiveness of TPRM but also strengthens the overall governance framework within the organization, ensuring that third-party relationships contribute positively to business objectives.

Best Practices for Internal Audit in Third Party Risk Management

In the realm of third-party risk management (TPRM) lifecycle, internal audit professionals play a pivotal role in identifying, assessing, and mitigating risks associated with external vendors and partners. As organizations increasingly rely on third parties for various services, the need for a robust internal audit function becomes paramount. Here are some actionable best practices that internal audit professionals can implement to enhance their effectiveness in TPRM.

1. Developing a Comprehensive Third Party Risk Management Framework

A well-structured TPRM framework is essential for identifying and managing risks associated with third-party relationships. Internal audit should collaborate with risk management teams to develop a framework that includes:

Risk Assessment Criteria: Establish clear criteria for evaluating third-party risks, including financial stability, compliance with regulations, and operational capabilities.

Risk Categorization: Classify third parties based on the level of risk they pose, which allows for tailored audit approaches and resource allocation.

Monitoring and Reporting: Implement ongoing monitoring mechanisms to track third-party performance and compliance, ensuring that any emerging risks are promptly addressed[1][2].

2. Utilizing Data Analytics for Risk Identification

Data analytics can significantly enhance the internal audit function’s ability to identify and assess third-party risks. By leveraging advanced analytical tools, auditors can:

Analyze Historical Data: Review past performance data of third parties to identify patterns or anomalies that may indicate potential risks.

Benchmarking: Compare third-party performance against industry standards or peer organizations to identify areas of concern.

Predictive Analytics: Use predictive modeling to forecast potential risks based on current trends and historical data, allowing for proactive risk management strategies[3][4].

3. Ensuring Collaboration with Procurement and Legal Teams

Effective TPRM requires a collaborative approach among various departments. Internal audit should work closely with procurement and legal teams to:

Align Objectives: Ensure that the objectives of the internal audit function align with procurement and legal strategies regarding third-party engagements.

Contract Review: Participate in the review of contracts to ensure that risk management clauses are included and that compliance requirements are clearly defined.

Information Sharing: Foster open communication channels to share insights and findings related to third-party risks, enhancing overall risk awareness across the organization[6].

4. Regular Training and Awareness Programs for Audit Staff

To maintain a high level of competency in Third Party Risk Management lifecycle, internal audit professionals should engage in continuous education and training. This can include:

Workshops and Seminars: Organize regular training sessions focused on the latest trends, regulations, and best practices in third-party risk management.

Knowledge Sharing: Encourage audit staff to share experiences and lessons learned from previous audits, fostering a culture of continuous improvement.

Certification Programs: Support staff in pursuing relevant certifications that enhance their understanding of TPRM and internal audit practices[7][8].

5. Continuous Improvement Through Feedback and Audits

The internal audit function should embrace a culture of continuous improvement by regularly seeking feedback and conducting audits of the TPRM process. This can be achieved by:

Post-Audit Reviews: After completing audits, gather feedback from stakeholders to identify areas for improvement in the audit process and TPRM framework.

Performance Metrics: Establish key performance indicators (KPIs) to measure the effectiveness of TPRM efforts and internal audit activities.

Iterative Process: Use insights gained from audits and feedback to refine the TPRM framework and internal audit methodologies, ensuring they remain relevant and effective in addressing emerging risks.

The role of internal audit in third-party risk management is critical for safeguarding organizations against potential risks associated with external partnerships. By implementing these best practices, internal audit professionals can enhance their effectiveness in TPRM, ensuring that risks are identified, assessed, and mitigated proactively. This not only protects the organization but also fosters a culture of risk awareness and accountability across all levels of the business. As the landscape of third-party relationships continues to evolve, so too must the strategies employed by internal audit to manage these risks effectively.

Challenges Faced by Internal Auditors in Third Party Risk Management

In the realm of third-party risk management (TPRM), internal auditors play a pivotal role in identifying, assessing, and mitigating risks associated with external partnerships. However, they encounter several challenges that can hinder their effectiveness. Understanding these obstacles is crucial for internal audit professionals aiming to enhance their TPRM processes. Below, we explore the key challenges faced by internal auditors in TPRM and offer strategies to overcome them.

Limited Resources and Expertise

One of the foremost challenges internal auditors face in Third Party Risk Management lifecycle is the limitation of resources and expertise. Many internal audit departments operate with constrained budgets and personnel, which can restrict their ability to conduct thorough assessments of third-party risks. This scarcity often leads to a reliance on outdated methodologies or insufficient risk evaluation techniques, ultimately compromising the effectiveness of the audit process[1].

Overcoming the Challenge: To address this issue, internal audit teams can invest in training and development programs to enhance their skills in TPRM. Collaborating with external experts or consultants can also provide valuable insights and bolster the team’s capabilities. Additionally, leveraging technology, such as risk management software, can streamline processes and improve efficiency, allowing auditors to focus on high-risk areas[2].

Complexity of Third-Party Relationships

The intricate nature of third-party relationships adds another layer of complexity to Third Party Risk Management lifecycle. Organizations often engage with a diverse array of vendors, suppliers, and partners, each with unique risk profiles and compliance requirements. This complexity can make it challenging for internal auditors to maintain a comprehensive view of all third-party risks and ensure that appropriate controls are in place[3].

Overcoming the Challenge: To navigate this complexity, internal auditors should adopt a risk-based approach to Third Party Risk Management lifecycle. This involves prioritizing third parties based on their risk levels and potential impact on the organization. Developing a robust framework for categorizing and assessing third-party relationships can help auditors focus their efforts on the most critical areas, ensuring that resources are allocated effectively[4].

Evolving Regulatory Requirements

The regulatory landscape surrounding third-party risk management is continually evolving, with new laws and guidelines emerging regularly. Internal auditors must stay abreast of these changes to ensure compliance and mitigate potential legal and financial repercussions. The dynamic nature of regulations can create uncertainty and complicate the audit process, particularly for organizations operating in multiple jurisdictions[5].

Overcoming the Challenge: To effectively manage evolving regulatory requirements, internal auditors should establish a continuous monitoring system that tracks changes in relevant laws and regulations. Engaging in regular training sessions and workshops can also help auditors stay informed about compliance obligations. Furthermore, fostering relationships with legal and compliance teams can facilitate better communication and understanding of regulatory expectations[6].

Resistance from Other Departments

Internal auditors often encounter resistance from other departments when attempting to implement Third Party Risk Management lifecycle initiatives. This resistance may stem from a lack of understanding of the importance of third-party risk management or concerns about the perceived burden of additional compliance requirements. Such pushback can hinder the internal audit function’s ability to collaborate effectively across the organization[7].

Overcoming the Challenge: To mitigate resistance, internal auditors should focus on building strong relationships with key stakeholders in other departments. Communicating the value of TPRM in terms of risk mitigation and organizational resilience can help garner support. Additionally, involving other departments in the TPRM process and soliciting their input can foster a sense of ownership and collaboration, reducing resistance and enhancing overall effectiveness[8].

Maintaining Independence While Being Collaborative

Striking a balance between maintaining independence and fostering collaboration is a significant challenge for internal auditors in TPRM. While auditors must remain objective and impartial in their assessments, they also need to work closely with various departments to gather information and implement risk management strategies. This dual requirement can create tension and complicate the audit process[9].

Overcoming the Challenge: To navigate this challenge, internal auditors should establish clear communication channels and set expectations with other departments. Emphasizing the collaborative nature of TPRM while reinforcing the importance of independence can help create a productive working environment. Additionally, adopting a transparent approach to reporting findings and recommendations can build trust and facilitate cooperation among stakeholders[10].

The challenges faced by internal auditors in third-party risk management are multifaceted and require strategic approaches to overcome. By addressing limitations in resources and expertise, navigating the complexity of third-party relationships, adapting to evolving regulatory requirements, managing resistance from other departments, and balancing independence with collaboration, internal auditors can enhance their effectiveness in mitigating third-party risks. Embracing best practices in Third Party Risk Management lifecycle not only strengthens the internal audit function but also contributes to the overall resilience and success of the organization.

Conclusion

In the realm of third-party risk management (TPRM) lifecycle, the internal audit function plays a pivotal role in ensuring that organizations effectively identify, assess, and mitigate risks associated with their external partners. As we conclude our exploration of the internal audit’s role in TPRM, it is essential to recap the critical contributions of internal audit throughout the risk management lifecycle, emphasize the importance of ongoing communication and collaboration, and encourage the adoption of best practices for effective risk management.

Recap of the Role of Internal Audit in the Lifecycle

Internal audit serves as a key player in the Third Party Risk Management lifecycle, which encompasses several stages: risk identification, risk assessment, risk mitigation, and ongoing monitoring. At each stage, internal auditors provide valuable insights and oversight that enhance the organization’s ability to manage third-party risks effectively.

During the risk identification phase, internal auditors help pinpoint potential risks associated with third-party relationships, ensuring that all relevant factors are considered. In the risk assessment stage, they evaluate the significance of identified risks, utilizing data analytics and risk assessment frameworks to prioritize risks based on their potential impact on the organization.

In the risk mitigation phase, internal audit collaborates with management to develop and implement strategies that address identified risks, ensuring that appropriate controls are in place. Finally, in the ongoing monitoring phase, internal auditors continuously review third-party relationships and the effectiveness of risk management strategies, providing assurance that risks are being managed appropriately and that compliance with regulatory requirements is maintained[1][2].

The Necessity for Ongoing Communication and Collaboration

Effective TPRM is not a one-time effort but rather a continuous process that requires ongoing communication and collaboration among various stakeholders. Internal audit professionals must engage with risk management teams, compliance officers, and business units to foster a culture of risk awareness and accountability.

Regular communication ensures that all parties are aligned on risk management objectives and that any emerging risks are promptly addressed. By facilitating open dialogue, internal auditors can help break down silos within the organization, promoting a holistic approach to risk management that encompasses all aspects of third-party relationships[3][4].

Encouragement to Adopt Best Practices for Effective Risk Management

To enhance the effectiveness of Third Party Risk Management lifecycle, internal audit professionals are encouraged to adopt best practices that can lead to improved risk management outcomes. These practices include:

Establishing a robust risk assessment framework: This framework should be dynamic and adaptable, allowing for the continuous evaluation of third-party risks as the business environment evolves.

Utilizing technology and data analytics: Leveraging technology can streamline the risk management process, enabling more efficient data collection, analysis, and reporting.

Conducting regular training and awareness programs: Educating employees about third-party risks and the importance of compliance can foster a proactive risk management culture within the organization.

Implementing a feedback loop: Creating mechanisms for feedback from stakeholders can help internal audit refine its processes and improve the overall effectiveness of TPRM initiatives[5][6].

In conclusion, the role of internal audit in third-party risk management is critical to safeguarding organizations against potential risks posed by external partners. By actively engaging in the Third Party Risk Management lifecycle, fostering ongoing communication and collaboration, and adopting best practices, internal audit professionals can significantly enhance their organization’s resilience against third-party risks. Proactive engagement in these areas not only strengthens risk management efforts but also contributes to the overall success and sustainability of the organization in an increasingly interconnected business landscape.

Find out more about Shaun Stoltz https://www.shaunstoltz.com/about/

This post was written by an AI and reviewed/edited by a human.