Blog

You are currently viewing Security and Data Protection: Workiva vs AuditBoard in Internal Auditing
Security and Data Protection - Workiva vs AuditBoard in Internal Auditing

Security and Data Protection: Workiva vs AuditBoard in Internal Auditing

In the realm of internal auditing, security and data protection are paramount. When comparing Workiva vs AuditBoard, it’s crucial to consider their security features. As organizations increasingly rely on digital solutions to manage their audit processes, the need for robust security measures becomes critical. Internal auditors are tasked with not only ensuring compliance and accuracy but also safeguarding sensitive information from potential breaches and unauthorized access. This dual responsibility underscores the importance of selecting a platform that prioritizes security features. 

Workiva and AuditBoard have emerged as leading platforms in the internal audit space, each offering unique capabilities tailored to meet the diverse needs of organizations. Workiva is recognized for its comprehensive cloud-based solutions that facilitate connected data reporting and compliance, making it a preferred choice for many enterprises. On the other hand, AuditBoard specializes in providing tools designed specifically for risk management and compliance, particularly in regulated industries. 

This blog post aims to delve into the security features of both Workiva and AuditBoard, providing a detailed comparison that will assist risk managers and IT security professionals in making informed decisions. By examining the strengths and weaknesses of each platform in terms of security and data protection, we hope to highlight the critical factors that should influence the choice of an internal audit solution. 

Overview of Workiva and AuditBoard 

In the realm of internal auditing, both Workiva and AuditBoard have established themselves as prominent platforms, each offering unique features and capabilities tailored to the needs of risk managers and IT security professionals. This section provides a foundational understanding of both platforms, focusing on their key features, user interfaces, target audiences, and market positions. 

Workiva 

Key Features: 

  • Integrated Financial Reporting: Workiva excels in providing a cloud-based platform that integrates audit, risk, and compliance functions, making it particularly beneficial for organizations that require comprehensive financial reporting capabilities [1]. 
  • Automated Evidence Gathering: The platform offers automated tools for evidence collection, reporting, and planning, which streamline the internal audit management process [12]. 
  • Collaboration Tools: Workiva includes features such as Dynamic Data Refresh and In-Excel Collaboration, enhancing real-time collaboration among team members [14]. 

User Interface: 

  • Workiva is noted for its user-friendly interface, which allows users to efficiently manage documents, data, and workflows. This design significantly reduces the time and effort required for compliance and reporting processes [13]. 

Target Audience: 

  • The platform is particularly suited for public companies and large enterprises with diverse governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) needs. Its robust features cater to organizations that prioritize financial and regulatory filing expertise [11]. 

AuditBoard 

Key Features: 

  • Unified Core and Platform Capabilities: AuditBoard offers a suite of applications, including RiskOversight and SOXHUB, which provide comprehensive tools for audit planning, risk assessment, and document management [4][6]. 
  • Real-Time Collaboration: The platform facilitates real-time collaboration between control owners, business owners, and auditors, enhancing communication and efficiency during the audit process [15]. 
  • User-Friendly Design: AuditBoard is recognized for its intuitive user interface, which simplifies the auditing process and allows for easy task assignment and follow-up [8]. 

User Interface: 

  • The interface of AuditBoard is designed to be user-friendly, enabling users to update work papers in real-time and manage their auditing tasks effectively [9]. 

Target Audience: 

  • AuditBoard is particularly beneficial for organizations in regulated industries that require pre-built frameworks for compliance with standards such as SOX and PCI DSS. It is ideal for growing companies that need scalable solutions for their audit and compliance programs [11]. 

Market Position and Reputation 

Both Workiva and AuditBoard have garnered positive reputations within the internal audit community. According to verified user reviews, AuditBoard holds a rating of 4.5 stars based on 698 reviews, while Workiva follows closely with a rating of 4.4 stars from 596 reviews [10]. This indicates a strong user satisfaction level for both platforms, highlighting their effectiveness in addressing the needs of internal auditors. 

While Workiva is recognized for its comprehensive financial reporting and collaboration features, AuditBoard stands out for its real-time collaboration capabilities and user-friendly design. Both platforms cater to distinct audiences and excel in their respective areas, making them valuable tools for risk managers and IT security professionals in the internal auditing landscape. 

Security Features of Workiva 

In the realm of internal auditing, security and data protection are paramount, especially for platforms like Workiva that handle sensitive financial and compliance data. Below are the key security features that Workiva implements to ensure robust data protection: 

  • Data Encryption Standards: Workiva employs advanced encryption protocols to safeguard data both at rest and in transit. This means that any data stored on their servers is encrypted, as well as any data being transmitted over networks, ensuring that unauthorized access is effectively mitigated [4]. 
  • User Authentication Options: To enhance security, Workiva offers multiple user authentication methods, including multi-factor authentication (MFA). This additional layer of security requires users to provide two or more verification factors to gain access, significantly reducing the risk of unauthorized access to sensitive information [6][10]. 
  • Access Controls and User Permissions Management: Workiva provides comprehensive access control features that allow organizations to manage user permissions meticulously. This ensures that only authorized personnel can access specific data and functionalities, thereby minimizing the risk of data breaches and ensuring that sensitive information is only available to those who need it [12]. 
  • Audit Trails and Logging Capabilities: The platform includes robust audit trails and logging capabilities, which are essential for compliance tracking. These features allow organizations to monitor user activities and changes made within the system, providing a clear record that can be reviewed for compliance purposes. This is particularly important for organizations that must adhere to strict regulatory requirements [11]. 
  • Compliance with Industry Standards and Regulations: Workiva is committed to maintaining compliance with various industry standards and regulations, including GDPR and SOC 2. This commitment not only demonstrates their dedication to data protection but also assures users that their data is handled in accordance with the highest security standards [14]. 

Workiva’s security features are designed to provide a comprehensive framework for data protection, making it a reliable choice for risk managers and IT security professionals in the internal auditing space. The combination of encryption, user authentication, access controls, audit trails, and compliance with industry standards underscores Workiva’s commitment to safeguarding sensitive information. 

Security Features of AuditBoard 

In the realm of internal auditing, the security of data and the integrity of processes are paramount. AuditBoard has established a robust framework of security measures designed to protect sensitive information and ensure compliance with industry standards. Below are the key security features that AuditBoard employs: 

  • Data Encryption Practices: AuditBoard utilizes advanced encryption protocols to safeguard data both at rest and in transit. This means that any data stored on their servers is encrypted, as well as any data being transmitted between users and the platform. This dual-layer encryption helps to prevent unauthorized access and ensures that sensitive information remains confidential [11]. 
  • User Authentication Methods: To enhance security, AuditBoard implements strong user authentication methods, including single sign-on (SSO) capabilities. This feature allows users to access the platform securely using their existing credentials from other trusted systems, reducing the risk of password fatigue and potential breaches associated with weak passwords [10]. 
  • Role-Based Access Controls: AuditBoard employs role-based access controls (RBAC) to manage user permissions effectively. This means that access to sensitive data and functionalities is granted based on the user’s role within the organization. By limiting access to only those who need it, AuditBoard minimizes the risk of data exposure and ensures that users can only perform actions relevant to their responsibilities. 
  • Audit Logs and Monitoring Features: The platform includes comprehensive audit logs and monitoring features that provide enhanced security oversight. These logs track user activities and changes made within the system, allowing organizations to review actions taken and identify any suspicious behavior. This transparency is crucial for maintaining accountability and ensuring compliance with internal policies and external regulations. 
  • Compliance with Industry Standards: AuditBoard is committed to maintaining compliance with relevant industry standards and regulations, such as ISO 27001 and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX). By adhering to these standards, AuditBoard demonstrates its dedication to data protection and risk management, providing users with confidence in the platform’s security measures. 

AuditBoard’s security features are designed to protect sensitive data and maintain the integrity of internal auditing processes. With robust encryption practices, strong user authentication, effective access controls, detailed monitoring, and compliance with industry standards, AuditBoard positions itself as a reliable choice for organizations prioritizing security in their internal audit functions. 

Comparative Analysis: Workiva vs AuditBoard 

In the realm of internal auditing, security and data protection are paramount, especially for risk managers and IT security professionals. This section provides a detailed comparison of the security features of Workiva and AuditBoard, focusing on their encryption strategies, user authentication methods, access control features, audit trail functionalities, and overall strengths and weaknesses. 

1. Encryption Strategies and Implementations 

  • Workiva employs robust encryption protocols to protect data both at rest and in transit. The platform utilizes industry-standard encryption methods, ensuring that sensitive information is safeguarded against unauthorized access. This is particularly beneficial for organizations handling financial and regulatory data, as it aligns with compliance requirements for data protection [10]. 
  • AuditBoard, on the other hand, also implements strong encryption techniques, focusing on protecting data integrity and confidentiality. Its connected risk platform is designed to elevate security measures, making it suitable for regulated industries that require adherence to standards like SOX and PCI DSS [15]. 

2. User Authentication Methods and Effectiveness 

  • Workiva offers multi-factor authentication (MFA) as a standard feature, enhancing security by requiring users to provide two or more verification factors to gain access. This method significantly reduces the risk of unauthorized access, making it a strong choice for organizations prioritizing security [14]. 
  • AuditBoard also supports MFA, along with single sign-on (SSO) capabilities, which streamline the user experience while maintaining high security standards. The effectiveness of these methods is reflected in user reviews, which highlight the ease of access without compromising security [2]. 

3. Access Control Features and Usability 

  • Workiva provides granular access control features, allowing administrators to define user roles and permissions meticulously. This level of customization ensures that sensitive data is only accessible to authorized personnel, which is crucial for maintaining data integrity [10][14]. 
  • AuditBoard similarly offers robust access control mechanisms, enabling organizations to implement role-based access that aligns with their internal policies. Users have noted the platform’s intuitive interface, which simplifies the management of access rights, making it user-friendly while still secure [2][15]. 

4. Audit Trail Functionalities and Compliance Alignment 

  • Workiva excels in its audit trail capabilities, providing comprehensive logging of user activities. This feature is essential for compliance audits, as it allows organizations to track changes and access to sensitive data effectively. The platform’s audit trails are designed to meet various regulatory requirements, ensuring that organizations can demonstrate compliance during audits [10][14]. 
  • AuditBoard also offers strong audit trail functionalities, with detailed logs that capture user interactions and changes made within the system. This feature is particularly beneficial for organizations in regulated industries, as it supports compliance with standards such as SOX and PCI DSS [15]. 

5. Strengths and Weaknesses Identified 

Strengths of Workiva: 

  • Strong encryption and MFA capabilities enhance data security. 
  • Granular access control features provide flexibility in user management. 
  • Comprehensive audit trail functionalities support compliance needs. 

Weaknesses of Workiva: 

  • Some users may find the initial setup complex due to the extensive customization options available [2]. 

Strengths of AuditBoard: 

  • User-friendly interface for managing access controls and audit trails. 
  • Effective encryption strategies suitable for regulated industries. 
  • Strong alignment with compliance standards, particularly for internal audits. 

Weaknesses of AuditBoard: 

  • May not be as robust in encryption options compared to Workiva, particularly for organizations with advanced security needs [10][15]. 

Both Workiva and AuditBoard offer strong security features tailored for internal auditing. The choice between the two will largely depend on the specific security requirements and compliance needs of the organization. Risk managers and IT security professionals should consider these factors carefully to select the platform that best aligns with their security objectives. 

User Experience and Support 

When evaluating internal audit solutions like Workiva and AuditBoard, the user experience and support provided by each platform play a crucial role in managing security effectively. Here, we will explore how these aspects influence security management for risk managers and IT security professionals. 

User Interface Design and Security Feature Accessibility 

The user interface (UI) design of a platform significantly impacts how easily users can access and utilize security features. 

  • AuditBoard is noted for its intuitive and user-friendly interface, which enhances efficiency and allows users to update work papers in real-time. This ease of use can facilitate quicker access to security features, enabling teams to respond promptly to potential risks [8][13]. 
  • Workiva, while also offering a user-friendly experience, emphasizes real-time collaboration across audit tasks. This feature can streamline communication regarding security issues, reducing the time taken to address vulnerabilities [12]. 

Both platforms prioritize user experience, but the specific design elements may cater to different organizational needs, particularly in how security features are integrated and accessed. 

Customer Support Options for Addressing Security Concerns 

Effective customer support is vital for addressing security concerns promptly and efficiently. 

  • AuditBoard provides customer support via email, which can be beneficial for users needing assistance with security-related inquiries. The platform is recognized for its excellent customer service, which can help users troubleshoot security issues effectively [11][3]. 
  • Workiva also offers email support, but it stands out for its focus on public companies and large enterprises, which often have complex security requirements. This specialization may provide users with tailored support for navigating security challenges in regulatory environments [12]. 

Both platforms offer essential support options, but the effectiveness of these services can vary based on the specific security needs of the organization. 

Training Resources for Risk Managers and IT Security Professionals 

Training resources are crucial for ensuring that users are well-equipped to manage security features effectively. 

  • AuditBoard offers a variety of training sessions and office hours, which can help users maximize the platform’s security capabilities. This proactive approach to training can empower risk managers and IT security professionals to better understand and utilize security features [3][14]. 
  • Workiva also provides training resources, focusing on real-time collaboration and audit processes. This training can be particularly beneficial for teams that need to stay agile in a rapidly changing risk landscape [12]. 

Both platforms recognize the importance of training, but the specific resources available may cater to different user needs and preferences. 

Community and User Feedback on Security-Related Experiences 

User feedback and community engagement can provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of security features in both platforms. 

  • AuditBoard has received positive reviews from users, highlighting its efficiency and user-friendly design. The community feedback often emphasizes the platform’s strengths in managing security-related tasks, which can be reassuring for organizations concerned about data protection [10][5]. 
  • Workiva also garners favorable reviews, particularly for its collaborative features that enhance security management. Users appreciate the platform’s ability to streamline communication and reporting, which can be critical in addressing security concerns [12]. 

Both platforms benefit from user feedback, which can guide improvements and adaptations in their security features, ultimately enhancing the overall user experience. 

In the context of internal auditing, the user experience and support provided by Workiva and AuditBoard are integral to effective security management. While both platforms offer user-friendly interfaces, robust customer support, and valuable training resources, the specific strengths and community feedback may influence the choice for risk managers and IT security professionals. Understanding these elements can help organizations make informed decisions that align with their security needs and operational goals. 

Conclusion 

In the realm of internal auditing, the significance of security cannot be overstated. As organizations increasingly rely on digital platforms to manage their audit processes, ensuring the protection of sensitive data and compliance with regulatory standards becomes paramount. Both Workiva and AuditBoard offer robust solutions tailored to meet the needs of risk managers and IT security professionals, but they differ in their approaches and features. 

Key Differences and Similarities: 

  • Security Features: Workiva emphasizes a comprehensive security framework that includes advanced encryption, user access controls, and compliance with industry standards. This makes it a strong contender for organizations prioritizing stringent security measures. In contrast, AuditBoard provides a user-friendly interface with integrated risk management capabilities, allowing for seamless connections between risks, audits, and findings, which can enhance overall security posture [7]. 
  • Integration and Usability: While both platforms offer integration capabilities with other tools, Workiva’s extensive API support allows for greater customization and flexibility, which can be crucial for organizations with specific security requirements. AuditBoard, on the other hand, focuses on ease of use, making it accessible for teams that may not have extensive technical expertise [1][3]. 
  • Cost and Value: Pricing structures vary between the two platforms, with Workiva often seen as a premium option due to its extensive features. AuditBoard may present a more cost-effective solution for organizations looking for essential audit management functionalities without the additional complexities [2][4]. 

Final Thoughts: 

When selecting a platform for internal auditing, risk managers and IT security professionals should carefully assess their organization’s specific security needs and priorities. Considerations such as the level of data sensitivity, regulatory compliance requirements, and the existing technological ecosystem will play a crucial role in determining the best fit. 

Ultimately, both Workiva and AuditBoard have their strengths, and the choice will depend on the unique context of the organization. It is advisable for decision-makers to conduct thorough research, possibly through demos or trials, to evaluate how each platform aligns with their security objectives. 

Call to Action: 

We encourage readers to take the time to assess their specific requirements and conduct further research into both Workiva and AuditBoard. Understanding the nuances of each platform will empower organizations to make informed decisions that enhance their internal audit processes while safeguarding their data and compliance efforts.

Find out more about Shaun Stoltz https://www.shaunstoltz.com/about/

This post was written by an AI and reviewed/edited by a human.

Ozair

Ozair Siddiqui is a distinguished Fellow Chartered Certified Accountant (FCCA) and Certified Internal Auditor (CIA) who brings over 11 years of expertise in auditing, accounting, and finance. As a university lecturer, he combines academic insight with extensive practical experience gained from roles at leading organizations. His research and publications focus on crucial areas including sustainability reporting, corporate governance, and Islamic finance, offering readers a unique perspective on internal audit and risk management. With certifications spanning CISA and FCPA, and proficiency in data analytics tools like Python and R Studios, Ozair provides cutting-edge insights on emerging audit technologies and best practices. His insights bridge the gap between theoretical frameworks and practical implementation in internal audit practices, particularly within the context of developing markets.

Leave a Reply